Jun 16, 2021 Council Zoning

YOU READY?

[00:00:03]

[CALL TO ORDER]

ASHLEY, DO WE HAVE A QUORUM? WE HAVE A QUORUM

[1. 21-00693 PA-6-21 18500-18600 Old Scenic Highway]

SEE A NON WE'LL GO TO COUNCIL MEMBERS.

COUNCIL MEMBERS OF MOTION TO DEFER TO THE JULY.

21ST IS AN ORDER SO MOVED BY COUNCILMAN MRO.

SO SECOND BY NO OPPOSITION.

SO MOVED

[2. 21-00694 PA-7-21 15694 and 15696 Old Scenic Highway]

WE'LL GO TO COUNCIL MEMBERS, COUNCIL ONE BANK'S MOTION, MOTION TO DEFER TO JULY 21ST BY COUNCILMAN BANKS.

SECOND BY KNOLL, ANY OPPOSITION SEE A NON SO ITEM

[Items 3 & 4]

I WILL LET YOU KNOW.

I'M GOING TO ASK THAT WE DEFER THIS ONE.

ITEM THREE, PA DASH EIGHT DASH 2 1 1 7 9 2 0 AND 1 7 9 6 0 OLD PERKINS ROAD EAST TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN FROM RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO EMPLOYMENT CENTER ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF OLD PERKINS ROAD, EAST NORTH OF HIGHLAND ROAD, COUNCIL DISTRICT NINE, HUDSON COMMISSION ACTION, MOTION TO APPROVE SEVEN TO ZERO ITEM FOUR CASE DASH CASE TWO FOUR DASH 2 1 1 7 9 2 0 AND 1 7 9 6 0 OLD PERKINS ROAD EAST TO RESOLVE FROM RURAL TO LIGHT COMMERCIAL THREE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF OLD PERKINS ROAD, EAST NORTH OF HIGHLAND ROAD, COUNCIL DISTRICT NINE, HUDSON MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED SEVEN, SEVEN TO ZERO.

I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR BOTH ITEMS THREE AND FOUR.

ANY MEMBERS FROM THE PUBLIC WISHING TO SPEAK, SEE A NON WE'LL MOVE TO COUNCIL MEMBERS.

THE CHAIR WILL MOVE TO DEFER ITEMS THREE AND FOUR FOR 30 DAYS.

SECOND BY ADAMS AND THE OPPOSITION C A NUN.

SO MOVED

[5. 21-00697 TA-1-21 Chapter 16, Signs]

THIS AMENDMENT REVISES CHAPTER SIXTEENS SIGNS TO CLARIFY DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS BY ADDING GRAPHICS, ESTABLISH A TIME PERIOD FOR TEMPORARY SIGNS AND ADDRESS LICENSING ISSUES.

COMMISSION ACTION, MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED SEVEN TO ZERO.

WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, SEEING NONE WE'LL MOVE TO COUNCIL MEMBERS.

MOTION, MOTION BY COUNCILMAN BANKS CAN ASK BY SOME COMMENT.

I'M SORRY, COUNCIL.

WHENEVER ROSA WHAT'S CONSIDERED A TEMPORARY SIGN.

I HAVEN'T GOT MONEY COMING.

I KNOW EVERYBODY'S HAVING SIDE ISSUES AND THEIR DISTRICT IS COMING UP AND I DIDN'T WANT TO MAKE COMMENTS.

UM, BRIAN, CAN YOU EXPLAIN TEMPORARY SIGNS? UM, THE HOPE JUST ALL OF IT FOR ME PLEASE.

YEAH, SURE.

UM, WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH THE PARIS ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, THE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND THE PERMIT OFFICE, AND ALSO COUNCILWOMAN BANKS TO MAKE SOME IMPROVEMENTS TO THIS CHAPTER IN THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE SPECIFICALLY RELATED TO TEMPORARY SIGNS, WHICH WOULD BE SIGNS THAT ARE ON A PIECE OF PROPERTY FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME.

RIGHT NOW, THERE, THERE WAS NOT A, A, A PARTICULAR PERMIT THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED.

THERE HAVE BEEN QUESTIONS ABOUT TEMPORARY SIGNS IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT AWAY.

THOSE BY DEFINITION WOULD BE ILLEGAL AND COULD BE REMOVED.

UM, THOSE ON TELEPHONE POLES OR ATTACHED ON ANY S ANY CITY PARISH RIGHT AWAY ARE, ARE DEEMED ILLEGAL.

SO THIS, UH, CLARIFIES THAT SECTION.

IT GIVES SOME PARAMETERS IN A PERMITTING PROCESS.

WE'VE ADDED SOME ILLUSTRATIONS AT THE DIRECTION OF THE PERMIT OFFICE TO MAKE THINGS EASIER FOR THEM TO ENFORCE.

AND, UH, ALSO ADDRESSED AN ISSUE THAT THE PR PARIS ATTORNEY'S OFFICE HAD DEALING WITH

[00:05:01]

AND THOSE COULD BE FINE.

YOU'RE WHAT HASN'T BEEN DONE.

OH, JUST A LITTLE BIT MORE ON THE CLARITY.

WHAT DID THE AUDITS OR THE POLICIES SAY BEFORE AND WHAT ARE YOU CHANGING OR UPDATING? SO WE HAVE ATTACHED TO THIS ITEM, A STRIKE TO AN UNDERLINE IN, IN THERE.

THERE ARE SOME MINOR CHANGES THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE SECTION, BUT OVERALL IT IS, UM, IT, UH, CLARIFIES DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS BY ADDING GRAPHICS THROUGHOUT THE CHAPTER.

IT ESTABLISH A SPECIFIC TIME PERIOD, WHICH IS THREE MONTHS FOR TEMPORARY SIGNS AND ADDRESSING A SPECIFIC LICENSING ISSUES THAT WOULD BE ACQUIRED.

YOU, YOU MEAN THEY'RE, THEY'RE RESTRICTED FROM ADDING GRAPHICS TO THE SIGNS.

I'M JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING.

WHEN YOU SAY THAT WE, WE, UH, WE'VE ADDED GRAPHICS AND ILLUSTRATIONS IN THE, IN THE CODE ITSELF THAT, THAT MAKE IT EASIER FOR THE, THE, UM, CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND THE STAFF AT THE PERMIT OFFICE TO ENFORCE AND, UM, UNDERSTAND THE CODE ORDINANCE.

RIGHT, RIGHT NOW IT'S, IT'S A LITTLE CONFUSING THE WAY IT IS.

THERE IS, UH, STILL A, UH, PERMIT, UM, THAT YOU CAN GET TO PLACE SIGN.

UH, I GUESS IN ILLEGAL LOCATIONS, THAT'S STILL INTACT, RIGHT? THAT'S CORRECT.

ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU.

OKAY.

SO, UM, BASED ON YOU ALL'S QUESTIONS AND WHAT WE SEE IN OUR AREA, UM, THIS HAS SEVERAL PURPOSES.

ONE IS TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT PEOPLE WENT THROUGH PERMITTING.

CAUSE YOU KNOW, MOST PEOPLE ARE JUST PUTTING SIGNS OUT.

SO UNLESS IT'S A NONPROFIT WITH A SPECIFIC EVENT WHERE EVERYBODY HAS TO GO THROUGH THE PERMITTING PROCESS, BUT EVERYBODY WON'T HAVE TO PAY.

SO LET'S JUST SAY, UM, IT ARE, IF ONE OF US WOULD A COMMUNITY CENTER HAVE AN EVENT, WE HAVE SIGNS OUT, WE WOULDN'T HAVE TO PAY, BUT WE STILL NEED TO GO TO COMMITTING SO THAT THEY CAN BE ABLE TO TRACK IT.

THE OTHER THING IS, UM, LIKE WE BUY HOUSES.

I HAD NO IDEA.

I MEAN, I KNEW THEY WERE A NUISANCE, BUT NOW WE'LL BE ABLE TO GET, THEY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO GET OUR PERMIT BECAUSE AS YOU ALL JUST INDICATE, ALL OF THAT IS ILLEGAL.

SO NOW ENFORCEMENT IS SOMETHING ELSE WE DISCUSSED AND WE ALSO DISCUSS HOW MUCH PERSONS SHOULD BE FINE.

SO NOW WHEN PEOPLE SEE THE SIGNS, THEY'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO LOCATE THEM, TELL THEM, AND UM, IF YOU WANT TO CALL ABOUT ALL THE, WE BUY HOUSES, WHICH IS HAVE TAKEN OVER MY, UM, DISTRICT, THEN EVERY LOCATION I PLAN TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY'RE, THEY GET FINE BECAUSE I'VE ACTUALLY CALLED A GUY AND HE HUNG UP IN MY FACE.

SO THEY, YOU KNOW, ANYTHING ELSE I FOUND OUT JUST FROM LISTENING TO HIM, I DIDN'T KNOW, IS THAT THE ONLY WAY SIGNS COMMERCIAL SIGNS CAN BE OUT IS THAT IS ON THAT PROPERTY.

SO THERE'S A SIGN ABOUT A CHICKEN WINGS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE HIGHWAY AND IT'S NOT THEIR PROP DOLL, THAT'S ILLEGAL.

SO WE ALL DON'T CUT IN.

UH, AFTER WE GET THROUGH ALL OF THIS, I DO WANT THEM TO DO A REPORT ON THE DIFFERENT SIGNS SO THAT WE CAN ARM CITIZENS TO HELP US TO ENFORCE THESE POLICIES.

AND CLEVE, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT HE DID MENTION IS THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE A CHECKLIST AND THEIR PERMIT NUMBER IS GOING TO BE LIKE, YOU HAVE TO PRINT THE CHECKLIST.

THE PERMIT NUMBER IS GOING TO BE ON YOUR SIDE.

SO THAT LETS US KNOW, YES, THEY DID.

FIRST OF ALL, GO TO PERMIT.

AND THEN WE CAN ACTUALLY GO TO THE WEBSITE TO SEE IF IT'S OUT OF DATE.

YOU SEE WHAT I'M SAYING? BUT WE'RE JUST TRYING TO CLEAN UP THE CITY, YOU KNOW, AND MAKE SOME MONEY TO COUNCILMAN GUNN.

MAKE MENTIONED.

I THINK CAMPAIGN SIGNS, WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN MENTIONED IS PROBABLY THE LARGEST VIOLATOR OF THIS.

I HEAR WE TALKING ABOUT, WE BUY HOUSES AND PIANO LESSONS AND ALL OF THAT, BUT I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE NOT RESTRICTING BUSINESS AND ENTITY AND INDUSTRY FROM, YOU KNOW, PLACING THESE SIGNS OUT.

BUT IT IS NO MENTION OF NOBODY SAID ANYTHING ABOUT CAMPAIGN SIGN.

SO WHAT'S THIS, WHAT'S THE SITUATION AS IT RELATES TO THIS WITH CAMPAIGN SIGNS.

SO THERE'S A SPECIFIC PERMIT PROCESS FOR CAMPAIGN SIGNS AND THEY'RE LOUD FOR WORK UP HERE AT THE TIME.

AND THEN AFTER THE CAMPAIGN'S OVER THE ELECTIONS HILL THAT THEY HAVE TO BE TAKEN UP BY THE APPLICANT,

[00:10:01]

IS THAT NOT THE SAME PROCESS THAT WE BUY HOUSES? UH, THE, ON THE LESSONS WOULD HAVE THE AFRICAN TOTALLY INTERESTING.

THAT SEEMS A LITTLE, UH, HYPOCRITICAL TO ME, BUT OKAY.

SO LET'S, LET'S TALK ABOUT, UM, WE BUY HOUSES BANKS.

OH, I'M SO I'M SORRY.

WE'LL GO TO COUNCILMAN.

SO YEAH, THAT BRINGS UP ONE OF THE, UH, PETROL IN THE SITUATION WITH THE CAMPAIGN THING IS, UM, SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THAT X AMOUNT OF TIME.

YOU CAN ONLY START PUTTING SIGNS OUT SO FAR BEFORE THE ELECTION.

HE HAS TECHNICALLY, THEY'RE ALL SUPPOSED TO COE ON THE PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT YOU'VE EITHER TALKED TO THAT PERSON OR WHATEVER ELSE DOES THAT HAPPEN.

ESPECIALLY ELECTION DAY.

I MEAN, IT JUST, I THINK WE PROBABLY PICKED UP, OH GOD, IT MUST HAVE BEEN 300 SIGNS AROUND ST.

ALPHONSUS THAT WERE JUST THROWN OUT THERE THAT DAY.

I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU'RE GOING TO STOP THAT.

UM, BUT I DO UNDERSTAND, HOPEFULLY IT CAN BE A LITTLE REGULATED.

MY QUESTION, UH, IS GOING TO BE BASED ON IN FORCE.

UM, WE GET THE PHONE CALLS ALL THE TIME AS COUNCIL MEMBERS, AS THESE SIGNS ARE PUT OUT HERE, THEY'RE OUT, UH, WHAT ARE YOU GONNA DO? WHAT ABOUT, WHAT DO YOU DO ABOUT, WELL, WE'RE GETTING TO THEM AS QUICK AS WE CAN.

I THINK IT'S GREAT THAT WE WANT TO FOCUS ON, YOU KNOW, THE, THE RULES AND REGULATIONS AND PERMIT AND, AND EVERYTHING ELSE, BUT WHAT ARE WE GONNA DO TO UP THE ANTE TO ACTUALLY GET RID OF THE SIGNS IN A TIMELY MANNER? UM, OR WE, IS THERE ANYTHING ADDRESSED IN HERE ON THAT, IN, IN WHAT THIS SIGNED ORDINANCE UPDATE IS GOING TO DO? THAT'S THE BIGGEST CONCERN THAT I HAVE, UH, YOU KNOW, WE BUY HOUSES OR, OR WHATEVER ELSE, YOU KNOW, YES, THEY'RE OUT THERE IS THE CITY PARISH WILL BE REQUIRED TO PICK THEM UP AND HAVE THEM REMOVED FROM THE ILLEGAL LOCATIONS, WHICH THEY CAN BE IN A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF TIME.

UH, WE'RE GOING TO DO MR. HO DID YOU WANT TO RESPOND TO COUNCILMAN MOGER? SO IF I UNDERSTAND, I GUESS YOUR QUESTION OR CONCERN THERE, THE BOTTOM LINE IS, IS ALL SIGNS ARE, ARE, UH, PROHIBITED WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY.

NOW, UH, TEMPORARY SIGNS, UNFORTUNATELY ARE NOT ADDRESSED.

THEY'RE NOT CLARIFIED.

THIS WAS AN ATTEMPT TO CLARIFY AND REGULATE TEMPORARY SIGNS FOR A PERIOD OF TIME, UH, REQUIRE A PERMITTING PROCESS SIMILAR TO THAT OF CAMPAIGN SIGNS AND TRACK THEM IN A WAY IN THE PERMIT SYSTEM WHERE VIOLATIONS COULD BE REPORTED AND THAT THE PERMIT OFFICE CAN FOLLOW UP WITH THEM AND TRACK THEM.

CAUSE RIGHT NOW THERE'S NO MECHANISM TO DO THAT.

I APPRECIATE JAMES A QUESTION, I GUESS.

I DON'T KNOW.

MAYBE I DIDN'T ANSWER IT FOR ME AS FAR AS INFORMING THAT'S, THAT'S MY BIGGEST CONCERN WITH THIS.

YES.

WE KNOW THE SIGNS ARE ILLEGAL.

WE KNOW WE CAN TRACK THEM.

WE CAN TRACK THEM BY THEIR PHONE NUMBER, SITTING ON THE SITE.

WE KNOW WHO'S PUTTING THEM OUT BECAUSE THEY'RE PUTTING THEIR NAME ON IT.

BUT AS FAR AS ENFORCEMENT, DO WE NEED SOMETHING TO STRENGTHEN THAT? OR DO YOU NEED MORE HELP IN THAT DEPARTMENT? LOOK, LET ME ANSWER THAT, UH, KIND OF QUESTION IT, YES, IT IS A CODE ENFORCEMENT ISSUE.

IT TAKES THE NOT ONLY CODE ENFORCEMENT TO GO OUT AND TO SEE IT, BUT ALSO TAKES THE CITIZENS TO REPORT IT ON 3, 1, 1.

UM, WHEN THAT INFORMATION IS GATHERED, THEN CODE ENFORCEMENT WILL GO OUT AND ENFORCE IT TO TAKE UP THE SIGNS.

OBVIOUSLY WE ALWAYS NEED, UH, MORE PEOPLE TO HELP.

IT IS ALSO SOMETHING THAT BRP D WILL HELP WITH TOO.

WHEN IT BECOMES A, AN ISSUE, A BEYOND JUST A CODE ENFORCEMENT ISSUE.

IF IT BECOMES A, A LINE OF SIGHT ISSUE THAT CAUSES TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, BE RPD WILL HELP ENFORCE THAT.

OKAY.

THAT'S NOT SOMETHING THEY'RE THERE.

THAT IS LIKE, THEY'RE GOING TO BE THEIR PRIMARY JOB, OBVIOUSLY, BUT IT'S GOING TO BE CODE ENFORCEMENT.

UM, BUT YES, IT WILL BE ENFORCED.

AND THAT GOES FOR CAMPAIGN SIGNS IS AS WELL.

I MEAN, THAT'S JUST BECAUSE SOMEBODY IS RUNNING FOR POLITICAL OFFICE, DOESN'T MAKE THEM EXEMPT FROM, FROM THAT TO COUNCILMAN DON'S POINT ABOUT THAT.

SO YES, IT WILL BE ENFORCED.

YOU'VE DONE COSMO, KELL, CASTLEMAN BASE MICROPHONE.

WHAT WE FIND EVEN WHEN WE ARE RUNNING IS, YOU KNOW, I'LL PAY FOR A PERMIT.

NOBODY ELSE DOES IN MY RACE.

AND YOU KNOW, SO ONE OF THE THINGS, EVEN IF YOU THINK ABOUT WE BUY HOUSES, DO Y'ALL THINK THEY, ANY OF THEM EVER, EVER, EVER WENT AND GOT A PERMIT.

SO BY THEM GETTING A PERMIT, ALL THE PERMIT NUMBER, THE PERMIT NUMBER HAS TO BE ON THE SIGN.

[00:15:01]

SO THEY DON'T SUPPOSED TO BE ON POLES.

THEY DON'T SUPPOSED TO BE.

PLUS WHEN YOU DO GET A PERMIT, YOU GOT A BEGINNING AND AN END TIME.

SO EVEN IF IT'S WE BUY HOUSES AND YOU GO GET IT ON, UM, JUNE 16TH AND IT IS UP FOR 90 DAYS THEN BECAUSE OF THE PERMIT NUMBER, WE KNOW THAT SEPTEMBER 16, IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DOWN.

THERE'S NO WAY THAT ARE ANY SIGN.

IT SHOULD BE EVER PLACED INDEFINITE.

AND THAT'S WHAT WE'RE HAVING.

WE'RE HAVING SIGNS OF ENDEAVOR.

CAMPAIGN SIGNS ARE NOT EVEN THAT THEY HAVE TO PUT THE PERMIT NUMBER.

LIKE MARK SAID A TIME BEFORE AFTER THE ELECTION.

BUT IF YOU START, UM, I MEAN THE WE'RE GOING TO GET AROUND IT.

YOU'RE GETTING FINE.

BUT FIRST OF ALL, IT'S TOTALLY ILLEGAL FOR THEM TO BE ON POLES.

IT'S TOTALLY ILLEGAL TO BE AT THE END OF A STOP SIGN FOR ANY BUSINESS.

NOT, NOT, NOT A NONPROFIT, NOT A POLITICAL SIGN, BUT THAT WAS OUR BUSINESS AND OUR PROBLEMS, OUR BUSINESSES, PIANO LESSONS, BUSINESS, THAT'S A BUSINESS.

AND SO IF YOU, BUT IF YOU FOLLOW THE RULES, THEN IT'S COOL.

SO IT'S NOT DISCRIMINATED DISCRIMINATING AGAINST ANYONE IS KEEPING US CITY FROM BEING TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF.

AND IT'S A DISPO.

THIS DISPARATE PRO PRO IS IT'S NOT FAIR.

IT'S NOT EVEN, THEY'RE ALL OVER THE NORTHERN PART OF THE PARENTS.

THEY ARE NOT SO FREQUENT IN THE SOUTHERN PART BECAUSE THERE'S GOING TO NOT GOING TO BE TOLERATED.

AND SO THAT IS WHY WE NEED, UM, THESE THINGS ADDRESSED.

AND THAT'S WHY THE AVERAGE CITIZEN COULD RIDE BY AND SEE THERE'S A PERMIT NUMBER.

THEY COULD PULL IT UP ON THE CITY AND THEN THEY COULD, THEY COULD WRITE IT, BUT IT'S GOING TO REDUCE DUST BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT IF IT DOESN'T HAVE A PERMIT NUMBER, IT SHOULDN'T BE THERE.

AND WE KNOW IT'S ILLEGAL.

WHAT'D YOU SAY, MR. DUNN, COUNCILWOMAN MROC, WHO WOULD EVER THOUGHT THAT WE WOULD GO ON AND ON ABOUT THIS, THIS IS A BIG DEAL.

SO TO, TO GET RID OF THEM, TO REPORT TO 3, 1, 1, ALONG WITH EVERYTHING ELSE THAT GETS REPORTED TO 3, 1, 1.

NOW, AM I, AM I WRONG, RANDY? WASN'T THERE SOME OTHER, WHEN YOU WERE IN THE MAYOR'S OFFICE, WASN'T THERE SOME OTHER PROCEDURE THAT WE WERE DOING IN ORDER TO REPORT SIGNS TO RESPOND, ASKING YOU A QUESTION.

SO I BELIEVE THE INITIATIVE YOU WERE REFERENCING IS SOMEONE COULD CALL 3, 1, 1, AND, UH, AND REPORT THE SIGN, THE BUSINESS NAME AND PHONE NUMBER WITHIN BE PUT ON A LIST AND THEY WOULD GET A ROBO CALL THE BUSINESS, THE SIGN, UH, UH, PHONE NUMBER.

WE'LL GET A ROBO CALL THAT ESSENTIALLY SAID YOUR SIGNS ARE ILLEGAL.

AND UNTIL YOU TAKE THEM DOWN, YOU GET THIS CALL AND THE FREQUENCY WOULD INCREASE.

IT WOULD START ONCE A DAY.

AND THE FREQUENCY WOULD INCREASE DEPENDING UPON HOW LONG THEY STAYED ON THE LIST THAT BUSINESS OWNER WOULD HAVE TO CALL 3, 1, 1 TO SAY, I GOT IT.

I PULLED THEM DOWN.

STOP THE ROBOCALLS.

OKAY.

IS IT, IT, IS THAT STILL IN OPERATION? AS FAR AS YOU KNOW, BARS, I KNOW THE BARS ON KNOW I WAS GOING TO ASK ANOTHER QUESTION.

I CAN'T REMEMBER.

YOU STILL HAVE A FOUR.

I CAN'T REMEMBER WHAT IT WAS.

DO YOU REMEMBER? SORRY, BUT THERE'S NOTHING TO PREVENT US FROM JUST PULLING THESE SIGNS UP RIGHT.

AS PERSONALLY.

THAT'S WHAT I'M SAYING.

THANK YOU.

SO I'LL INTERJECT SOMETHING REAL, REAL QUICK HERE.

AND I APPRECIATE COUNCILMAN DUNN FOR MAKING THE MENTION OF THE POLITICIANS.

I THINK THAT FOLKS KNOW THAT'S MY ISSUE.

I WILL ALSO SAY THAT COUNCILMAN BANKS AND I HAVE BEEN THIS SORT OF TAG TEAM AND EMAILS WITH THE ADMINISTRATION ABOUT ENFORCEMENT OF THIS.

AND IT WOULD PROBABLY BE GOOD FOR THIS COUNCIL TO PUT AN ITEM ON THE AGENDA, TO GET AN UPDATE FROM THE ADMINISTRATION THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF THAT IS HERE IS NOT REALLY THE STAFF THAT IS PREPARED TO ANSWER THE ENFORCEMENT QUESTION.

IT'S NOT THEIR ROLE.

I WILL TELL YOU THAT WE HAVE A GREAT ORDINANCE THAT NOW ALLOWS US TO GO AFTER.

IT USED TO BE THAT YOU HAD TO ACTUALLY PHYSICALLY SEE SOMEONE PLACED THE SIGN TO GIVE THEM THE TICKET.

NOW, THE ORDINANCE ALLOWS YOU TO GO IN AND GO AFTER THE BUSINESS PERSON BASED ON THE NAME AND THE ADVERTISEMENT THAT'S ON THE SIGN.

WE HOWEVER ARE NOT CURRENTLY USING THAT ORDINANCE TO ITS FULL CAPACITY, RIGHT? WE'VE NOT ISSUED THOSE FUNDS YET.

PIANO LESSONS, GUY.

I PROMISE YOU I'M COMING FOR YOU.

BUT HAVING SAID THAT, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE

[00:20:01]

SO MOVED, UM,

[Items 6 & 7]

ITEM SIX, TA DASH TWO DASH TWO ONE APPENDIX J STREET CROSS SECTIONS.

THIS AMENDMENT ADDS NEW STREET.

CROSS-SECTIONS TO APPENDIX J IN AN EFFORT TO INCORPORATE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMPLETE STREETS COMMISSION ACTION, MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED SEVEN TO ZERO ITEM SEVEN TA DASH THREE DASH TWO, ONE CHAPTER 15, FLOOD WAYS FLOODPLAINS DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY.

THAT'LL READ THIS PART, SLOW.

THIS AMENDMENT REVISES THE FLOOD PLAIN ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE GREATER PROTECTION FROM FLOODING COMMISSION ACTION, NO HEARINGS FOR, FOR PLANNING COMMISSION REQUIRED PER UDC, SECTION FIFTEEN.ONE DOT FOUR.

UM, WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, SEEING NONE.

UH, WE WILL MOVE TO COUNCIL MEMBERS.

COUNCIL MEMBER MOKE ARE THESE.

THESE ARE TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THINGS, BUT WE'RE TAKING THEM TOGETHER.

I GUESS IF I COULD HAVE SOMEBODY COME UP AND THE AMENDMENTS TO THE STREET CROSS SECTION, ARE WE JUST DEFINING AS FAR AS WHAT AREAS WILL BE THE GREEN, UH, UH, WALKWAYS OR MAKE IT A COMPLETE STREET? WHAT DO WE DEFINE IT HERE? SO BOTH THESE ITEMS ARE RELATED AND THEY COME DIRECTLY FROM THE STORMWATER MASTER PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE.

AND THEN THERE WERE A SERIES OF INTERIM RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THAT THAT STEERING COMMITTEE.

WE DO HAVE THE CONSULTANTS FROM THE PROJECT HERE TODAY TO HELP ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

THE FIRST ITEM IS TO INCORPORATE APPROVED BEST PRACTICE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE, CROSS SECTIONS INTO INCORPORATE THOSE INTO OUR UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TO OFFER THOSE AS, UM, CROSS SECTIONS, TO INCORPORATE INTO NEW SUBDIVISIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS THROUGHOUT THE PARISH.

RIGHT NOW, MOVE BR UH, ADDED THESE SIMILAR CROSS SECTIONS TO ALL NEW MOVIE OR PROJECTS THAT ARE GOING TO BE GOING ON IN AN EFFORT TO ADD CAPACITY AND, UH, TO HELP WITH STORMWATER RELIEF OR THESE MORE FREQUENT STORMS THAT WE'RE EXPERIENCING.

SO WE'RE EXCITED TO INCORPORATE THESE IN THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE AND HAVE DEVELOPERS USE THESE.

UM, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THEM, WHAT RYAN, UH, IF YOU WOULD JUST WALK US THROUGH ITEM SEVEN AS WELL, AND, AND LET US KNOW ABOUT THE FLOOD PROTECTIONS THAT WE'RE HAVING.

SO ITEM SEVEN IS, LIKE I SAID, IS A RELATED ITEM THAT DID COME, UH, ALONG WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE CROSS SECTIONS.

IT ADDS CONVEYANCE CHECKS AS A REQUIREMENT, AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPACT STUDY OR ADDITIONAL CHECKS AND BALANCES, UH, BOTH UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS REQUIRING DEVELOPERS, UH, TO INCORPORATE THIS AS PART OF THEIR, THEIR REQUIRED STUDY.

SO THIS WILL MAKE A BIG IMPACT MOVING FORWARD.

AND, AND AGAIN, WE'RE HAPPY TO BRING THESE FORWARD, UM, TO YOU GUYS AND HOPEFULLY GET APPROVED AND RIGHT, IF YOU WOULD EXPOUND A LITTLE BIT ON THE CONVEYANCE CHECK, UM, I, I'M MOSTLY INTERESTED IN THAT BECAUSE WE'RE DEALING WITH THIS ISSUE RIGHT NOW IN DISTRICT NINE.

UM, SO I WAS MOST EXCITED ABOUT THIS PIECE OF IT.

SO IF YOU WOULDN'T JUST, UM, MELISSA BACKGROUND, I'M MELISSA KENNEDY WITH H MTV.

I AM THE PROJECT MANAGER FOR THE STORMWATER MASTER PLAN AND MARK GOODSON FROM CSRS.

HE'S THE LEAD ON DEVELOPING THE ORDINANCES RIGHT NOW.

SO THE CONVEYANCE CHECK BASICALLY IS A, IT'S A DESIGN, UM, CHECK RIGHT NOW.

UH, THE FOCUS ON EVALUATING THE DRAINAGE IS ON THE SPECIFIC SITE ITSELF.

SO WHAT THIS DOES IS IT EVALUATES THE DRAINAGE BEYOND THE SITE TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE ARE NO UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM IMPACTS WHEN THEY DO THE SITE DEVELOPMENT.

SO THIS CHECK REQUIRES THEM TO USE A, A LITTLE BIT MORE SOPHISTICATED ENGINEERING HYDRAULIC MODEL TO EVALUATE THOSE IMPACTS AND MAKE SURE THERE AREN'T ANY, THAT'S THE INTENT.

THANK YOU, COUNCILMAN COUNCILMAN.

NO, THANK YOU.

UM, THAT'S FANTASTIC.

I REALLY APPRECIATE THAT.

I THINK THAT'S A LOT OF WHAT WE'VE SEEN, UH, AND PROBABLY ALL OF OUR DISTRICTS, ESPECIALLY RECENTLY, UH, WHERE YOU HAVE OLDER SUBDIVISIONS AND A NEW DEVELOPMENT RIGHT NEXT TO IT THAT IS NOW CAUSING ISSUES.

THEY HAVE A DRAINAGE IMPACT STUDY.

IT SAYS, HEY, WE TAKE CARE OF OUR WATER.

WE PROVED IT.

WE'VE GOT AN ENGINEER'S STAMP.

AND LO AND BEHOLD, THE PEOPLE NEXT TO THEM ARE GETTING FLOODED OUT.

THEY NEVER FLOODED BEFORE AND NOW THEY'RE HAVING ISSUES.

SO THIS ADDRESSES THAT, IT SOUNDS LIKE, UH, ONE QUESTION I DO HAVE BEYOND THAT, AND THIS IS SOMETHING I HAVE DISCUSSED FOR A LONG TIME AND TRIED TO FIND THE APPROPRIATE MECHANISM.

AND IF Y'ALL MAY BE ABLE TO EXPOUND ON,

[00:25:02]

WHAT I WOULD ENVISION WOULD BE OPTIMAL IS TO HAVE, IF YOU'RE COMING IN LAST, YOU HAVE TO ASSUME THAT THE ONE IN FRONT OF YOU IS APPROVED AS PART OF YOUR PLAN OR WAIT.

UH, AND AGAIN, THAT GIVES IT, IT, IT MIGHT BE A BURDEN AND I DON'T WANT TO PUT UNDUE BURDEN ON DEVELOPMENT, A PROMISE.

UM, LOOK, I'M A, I'M A COMMERCIAL LENDER.

I DO LEND INTO DEVELOPMENTS AND I'M A REAL ESTATE BROKER AND OWN REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE.

I PROMISE YOU, I'M NOT AGAINST DEVELOPMENT, BUT, BUT I DIDN'T NAME IT.

I'M JUST SAYING I'M NOT AGAINST DEVELOPMENT, BUT THIS IS A PROBLEM WE KEEP SEEING OFTEN.

AND I THINK IT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED AND MAYBE A SLOWING DOWN ISN'T NECESSARILY A BAD THING.

AND, AND, UH, BECAUSE CERTAINLY IF YOU'RE COMING AND EVERYBODY'S USING EXISTING DATA, WHAT EXISTS TODAY TO DO THEIR, UH, DRAINAGE IMPACT STUDY, THIS IS CERTAINLY A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION, BUT MAYBE THEY SHOULD ALSO ACCOUNT FOR ANYTHING ELSE THAT'S COMING THROUGH THE PROCESS AT THE SAME TIME AS THEM, DO WE HAVE A MECHANISM IN PLACE FOR THAT? SO PART OF THE CONVEYANCE CHECK WILL BE PROVIDING, YOU KNOW, UPDATING THE MODEL WITH YOUR DEVELOPMENT IN IT AS WELL.

SO THAT, YOU KNOW, IN SENDING IT BACK TO, YOU KNOW, OUR CONSULTANTS AND MY OFFICE, THE SUBDIVISION OFFICE, AND NO CHECKING THAT, SO THAT IN THE FUTURE, THAT IT'S NOT JUST THAT, THAT SNAPSHOT, THAT ONCE WAS WHEN THEY PUT THE MODEL TOGETHER THAT IT'S PERPETUALLY UPDATED.

UM, AND THEN ALSO, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO HAVE ANY, YOU KNOW, ADVERSE IMPACT ANYWHERE ELSE AS WELL.

SO THAT'S PART OF THE WHOLE CONVEYANCE CHECK-IN IN ITSELF.

SO, YOU KNOW, JUST BECAUSE TWO PEOPLE COME IN NEXT DOOR, IF THEY'RE THERE OR NOT, YOU STILL SHOULDN'T BE HAVING ADVERSE IMPACT ON, ON ANYONE ELSE AROUND YOU.

SO IN THE END, THE CONVENIENCE CHECK IS GONNA, I FEEL LIKE HELPED THAT SIGNIFICANTLY.

UM, THERE'S ALSO SOME OTHER, UH, MINOR TWEAKS THAT WE'VE DONE IN SOME OF THE ORDINANCES AND THE DRAINAGE AND, UM, TO KIND OF CODIFY SOME OF OUR INTERNAL POLICIES THAT WE'VE RECENTLY STARTED TRYING TO TIGHTEN DOWN ON, ON SOME THINGS THAT WE FELT AREN'T NECESSARILY BEST PRACTICE.

AND SO NOW THEY'RE GOING TO BE CODIFIED AND THEY'RE NOT GOING TO BE ALLOWED AS PART OF CHAPTER 15.

SO ALTOGETHER WITH THE STORM WATER MASTER PLAN AND, AND ALL THESE CHANGES IN WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO RECOMMEND IN THE FUTURE TOO, AS WELL AS I THINK REALLY GONNA TIGHTEN UP SOME OF THESE THINGS AND ENSURE THAT THERE IS NO ADVERSE IMPACT.

OKAY.

SO YOU FEEL LIKE IT COVERS THAT REGARDLESS OF WHAT THAT NEIGHBORING PROPERTY MAY OR MAY NOT BE DOING AT THAT GIVEN TIME.

IT SHOULD SHOW THAT IT DOESN'T HAVE AN EFFECT ON IT, REGARDLESS WHETHER THEY'RE GOING TO KEEP IT AS A CO-PASTOR OR BUILD A SUBDIVISION.

IT SHOULDN'T MATTER.

YES, SIR.

100%.

THANK YOU, COUNCILMAN DONE.

BRIAN, YOU MENTIONED THAT THESE TWO ITEMS OF RECOMMENDATION OF THE STORM WATER MASTER PLAN FROM AGENT TP, THEY'VE BEEN WORKING ON THAT FOR A COUPLE OF MONTHS.

NOW, IS THIS THE FIRST TWO ITEMS THAT HAVE ATTEMPTED TO IMPLEMENT A REAL TIME? SECONDLY, WHERE ARE WE WITH THE STORM WATER MASTER PLAN, IF IT'S NOT COMPLETE, WHAT PERCENTAGE OF IT IS COMPLETE AND WHAT'S THE EXPECTED COMPLETION DATE, IF IT'S NOT COMPLETE AND FINALLY, UH, DO WE ANTICIPATE WHY THEY CONTINUE AND WORKING ON IT, THAT WE WILL CONTINUE TO, UH, IMPLEMENT SOME OF THESE RECOMMENDATIONS IN REAL TIME? OKAY.

UH, I CAN TRY TO HELP ANSWER SOME OF THE QUESTIONS AND I'LL RELY ON THE CONSULTANTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

UM, JUST TO GIVE EVERYONE AN UPDATE SINCE, UH, THESE ARE THE, THE KIND OF FIRST INTERIM CHANGES TO THE CODE SINCE THE STORM WATER PLAN HAS BEEN UNDERWAY.

HOWEVER, UH, WE HAVE DONE SIGNIFICANT WORK WITH THE MAYOR'S OFFICE, UH, WITH THE FEDERATION OF CIVIC ASSOCIATIONS WITH THIS COUNCIL, UM, AND THE PREVIOUS COUNCIL ON, ON UPDATING THE CODE UPDATING CHAPTER 15, WE'VE, UH, I'LL RUN THROUGH JUST A SERIES OF THOSE UPDATES WITH YOU REAL QUICK.

I ATTACH THAT AS A MEMO TO THIS ITEM IN 2017, WE REDUCED DEVELOPMENT DENSITY IN RURAL ZONING DISTRICT.

UM, IN 2018, WE REQUIRED DEVELOPMENTS TO DESIGN FOR A 25 YEAR STORM EVENT AND ANY INCREASE FROM THE PREVIOUS 10 YEAR REQUIREMENT, UH, THAT WAS IN THE CODE.

THEN WE MADE REVISIONS REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF FUEL THAT CAN BE BROUGHT IN AND PLACED IN SPECIAL

[00:30:01]

WE ALSO REVISED PROHIBITING NEW POINT AND NON-POINT SOURCE DISCHARGES ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES WITH WITHOUT DEDICATED DRAINAGE.

SERVITUDES WE MADE A REVISION IN THE SAME YEAR REQUIRING MAINTENANCE AND REGULAR INSPECTIONS OF ALL DRAINAGE FACILITIES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.

THAT WAS A BIG, UH, CONCERN THAT, THAT THESE NEW DETENTION FACILITIES THAT WERE BEING INSTALLED IN NEW NEIGHBORHOODS, THAT THERE WAS NO MECHANISM TO FOLLOW UP ON THE, ON THE ONGOING MAINTENANCE CAUSE THEY DO HAVE TO BE MAINTAINED.

SO THAT'S, THAT'S PART OF THE CODE NOW THEY'RE, UH, THEY'RE REQUIRED, UM, TO, TO SIGN OFF ON THAT AS PART OF THEIR, THEIR ENGINEERING FILE, THAT WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS OFFICE, AND THERE, THERE IS A MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE THAT'S, THAT'S ATTACHED WITH EACH APPROVED DEVELOPMENT.

UM, ALSO WE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS OF THOSE FACILITIES THAT THE CITY PARISH CAN GO OUT AND REGULARLY INSPECT THEM, UM, TO, TO VERIFY THE MAINTENANCE OF THEM THAT HAS TO BE DONE AGAIN BY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL REQUIRED DRAINAGE FACILITIES TO BE INSTALLED ON DAY ONE OF ANY LARGER DEVELOPMENTS BEFORE YOU BUILD ANY BUILDINGS OR ANYTHING.

THE FIRST THING IN HAS TO BE THAT, THAT EXISTING DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE, SO THAT, THAT WE FEEL WAS A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION AND IMPROVEMENT TO THE PREVIOUS CODE.

THEN IN 2019, WE ESTABLISHED REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF OPEN SPACE AND ALL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS THERE.

PRIOR TO THAT, THERE WAS NO REQUIRED OPEN SPACE IN SUBDIVISIONS.

THERE WAS IN SOME PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS, BUT WE MADE IT ACROSS THE BOARD THAT THERE WOULD BE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AND ALL DEVELOPMENTS ADDED THAT AS PART OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE.

WE, UM, AMENDED THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE ELEVATION OF STREETS AND PARKING LOTS BASED ON THE RECORD FLOOD INUNDATION, UM, COULD, COULD BE LOWER TO TAKE ON WATER AND ADDED CAPACITY.

THE THOUGHT IS IT'S BETTER TO HAVE THE ROAD FLOOD AND HOLD WATER IN A HIGH, HIGH RAN EVENT, THEN ACTUALLY GO IN HOMES.

AND UNFORTUNATELY, I KNOW THERE WAS MANY HOMES THAT DID FLOOD.

UM, THERE WAS QUITE A BIT OF WATER IN THIS, THIS MOST RECENT FLASH FLOOD EVENT, BUT, UH, WE ARE TAKING STEPS TO MOVE IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION WE WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO.

AND, UM, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU GUYS WANT TO ADD A STATUS, I CAN DO THAT.

UM, SO WE'RE ABOUT A YEAR AND A HALF IN, WE HAVE ANOTHER YEAR TO GO, UH, WE'RE ABOUT 65% COMPLETE.

THE FIRST YEAR WAS FOCUSED ON THE DATA COLLECTION.

THAT PART IS COMPLETE AND WE'RE UTILIZING THAT DATA TO DEVELOP OUR MODELS.

UM, THERE'S 11 WATERSHEDS WITHIN THE PARISH THAT WE'RE EVALUATING.

SO WE HAVE MODELS FOR EACH ONE OF THOSE, AS WELL AS WE'RE GOING TO COMBINE AND HAVE A REGIONAL MODEL.

UM, THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR ALL OF THOSE MODELS ARE CLOSE TO BEING COMPLETE.

AT WHICH POINT IN TIME WE'LL UTILIZE THOSE MODELS TO THEN DEVELOP SOLUTIONS AND EVALUATE THOSE SOLUTIONS BASED ON A BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS.

UM, WE ALSO DID THE INTERIM ORDINANCES AS YOU JUST HEARD, AND WE WILL BE FOCUSING ON ADDITIONAL ORDINANCE REVISIONS FOR, UM, DEVELOPMENT AND FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT.

AND WE'RE ALSO EMBARKING ON A PRETTY SIGNIFICANT PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM GOING FORWARD.

UM, I ACTUALLY WILL BE GIVING A, UM, STATUS REPORT NEXT COUNCIL MEETING FOR THE WHOLE PLAN.

UM, WE ALSO HAVE A PUBLIC MEETING, VIRTUAL PUBLIC MEETING JUNE 24TH.

SO, UH, I'LL BE GIVING A STATUS AND KIND OF MORE OF A GENERAL EDUCATION, UM, OVERVIEW ON STORM WATER MANAGEMENT.

SO THAT'S COMING UP AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO BE DOING STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT WITH EACH OF THEM WATERSHEDS AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT FOR EACH OF THE WATERSHEDS GOING FORWARD.

THEY ATTEND THEN IS TO GET TO A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN, A 20 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN IN WHICH WE ALSO TRY TO FIGURE OUT HOW WE'RE GOING TO PAY FOR ALL THAT COUNCILMAN DAN, WOULD YOU LIKE YOUR EXTRA TIME OR ARE YOU COMPLETE? I'M GOOD.

OKAY.

GOOD JOB.

ANY OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS ENTERTAIN MOTIONS MOTION BY A COUNCIL WILL VOTE ON ITEM SIX FIRST MOTION TO APPROVE COUNCILMAN MARK.

HAS THE FLOOR BEEN DONE? I APPRECIATE YOU ASKING THE QUESTION.

AS FAR AS PASSING THESE, YOU KNOW, SMALLER THINGS, AS FAR AS WE GO, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT A YEAR OUT BEFORE WE DO THE MASSIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE, LIKE THE VALUES AND DRAINAGE AND THINGS LIKE THAT.

THERE'S ONGOING PROGRAMS RIGHT NOW.

UM, THERE'S HAZARD MITIGATION PROGRAM PROJECTS THAT WE'VE ALREADY DEVELOPED AND ARE, HAVE BEEN APPROVED.

SO THOSE ARE MOVING FORWARD.

UM, THE PARISH IS ALSO UTILIZING ABOUT 20 MILLION FROM THE CARES ACT TO WORK ON SOME OF THE BACKLOG OF MAINTENANCE ISSUES IN THE CHANNELS, JUST LIKE YOU'RE TALKING.

UM, THEY INTEND TO CLEAR CHANNELS BEYOND WHAT THE CORPS IS DOING IN THE USA TRIBUTARIES

[00:35:01]

SO THEY'RE GOING TO BE DOING SOME OF THAT, SOME OF THE CLEANING OF THE SUBSURFACE SYSTEM, UM, SOME OF THE ROADSIDE DITCH CLEANING, UH, AREAS WHERE THEY HAVE ROADSIDE CAVAN'S THERE.

THEY'RE TRYING TO DO SOME OF THE CATCH-UP ON THE 3, 1, 1 CALLS.

SO JUST TO CONFIRM IT, AND FOR THE PUBLIC WISE, YOU HAVE ENOUGH DATA THAT WE HAVE, WE'VE ALREADY ALLOCATED 20 MILLION OF THE CARES ACT.

UH, THERE'S MORE THAT COULD BE IS, OR COMING DOWN THE PIPE OR WHATEVER ELSE, BUT YOU HAVE ENOUGH DATA THAT WE CAN AND START MOVING FORWARD INSTEAD OF WAITING FOR THIS FULL YEAR, WHEN YOU SUBMIT YOUR FINAL PLAN AND EVERYTHING ELSE THAT, THAT WE ARE GOING FORWARD, I JUST DON'T WANT THE PUBLIC THINKING.

YOU'VE GOT ANOTHER YEAR OUT WITH YOUR PLANNING AND EVERYTHING, AND WE'RE GOING TO WAIT FOR THAT FINAL PLAN TO GO ON.

WE'RE GOING TO IMPLEMENT A LOT OF THIS AS WE GO, AND WE'RE WORKING TO MOVE FORWARD RIGHT NOW AND WHAT WE CAN DO WITHOUT THE COURT'S PERMISSION, CORRECT? CORRECT.

AND WE ALSO HAVE TWO, UH, WATER SET INITIATIVE PROJECTS THAT WERE APPROVED BY FLOOD, PLAIN RUSS, UH, FLOOD, FLAME PRESERVATION AND HORTON CREEK FLOODPLAIN PRESERVATION.

AND THERE'LL BE ADDITIONAL ROUNDS FOR THE WATERSHED INITIATIVE THAT WE HOPE TO GET OTHER PROJECTS APPROVED THROUGH THAT AS WELL, ONGOING WHILE WE DEVELOP ADDITIONAL PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS. OKAY.

THANK YOU.

MOTION APPROVED BY COUNCILMAN MOAT.

SECOND BY COUNCILMAN DONE IN THE OPPOSITION HERE.

NONE ITEM SIX IS APPROVED.

WE'LL VOTE ON ITEM SEVEN, MOTION BY COUNCILMAN DONE.

SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MOPE.

ANY OPPOSITION SEEING NONE ITEM SEVEN CARRIES ITEM

[8. 21-00700 Case 16-21 6033 North Foster Drive]

OKAY.

SEEING NONE.

COUNCILMAN GREEN MOTION APPROVED BY COUNCIL AND THE GREEN SECOND BY MOKE AND THE OPPOSITION SEEING NONE ITEM CARRIES ITEM

[9. 21-00701 Case 18-21 718, 734, 750 W Roosevelt Street, and 2826 Alaska Street]

SO MOVED SECOND BY COUNCILMAN DUNN AND THE OPPOSITION SEEING NONE MOTION CARRIES ITEM

[10. 21-00702 Case 21-21 8833 Goodwood Boulevard]

RESIDENTIAL TO LIMITED RESIDENTIAL ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF GOODWOOD BOULEVARD, EAST OF CONNELL'S PARK LANE, COUNCIL DISTRICT 11 ADAMS COMMISSION ACTION, MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED SIX TO ZERO.

WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, SEEING NONE WE'LL MOVE TO COUNCIL MEMBERS, COUNCIL, WOMAN ADAMS, MOTION TO APPROVE SECOND BY COUNCILMAN DUNN.

ANY OPPOSITION SEEING NONE MOTION CARRIES ITEM 11

[11. 21-00703 Case 22-21 1010 Nicholson Drive]

WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

OKAY.

NONE WE'LL MOVE TO COUNCIL MEMBERS.

COUNCILMAN COLEMAN MOTION APPROVED BY COUNCIL WITH COLEMAN.

SECOND BY COUNCILMAN GREEN, SEEING NO OPPOSITION MOTION CARRIES ITEM

[12. 21-00705 RV-6-21 Calais Office Park Revocation]

ANY OPPOSITION SEEING NONE? SO MOVED ITEM

[13. 21-00726 RV-7-21 Jesse Nolan, Jr. Revocation]

REVOCATION REQUEST TO REVOKE A 15 FOOT PUBLIC SEWER SERVITUDE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND ROAD, WEST OF HIGHLAND POINT DRIVE COUNCIL DISTRICT THREE, GO DAY COMMISSION ACTION.

NO HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION PER

[00:40:01]

WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, SEEING NONE WE'LL MOVE TO COUNCIL MEMBERS.

COUNCIL MEMBER GO DAY.

WE'LL OPEN THE FLOOR TO MOTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS.

SO MOVED BY COUNCIL.

MOROCCO.

DO WE HAVE A SECOND SECOND BY COUNCILMAN ADAMS AND THE OPPOSITION SEEING NONE.

THE ITEM CARRIES A MOTION TO ADJOURN AS AN ORDER MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GREEN.

SECOND BY EMMA ROSSO, NO OPPOSITION.

WE ARE ADJOURNED.