[00:00:04]
GOOD AFTERNOON[CALL TO ORDER]
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, AND WELCOME TO OUR REGULARLY SCHEDULED METROPOLITAN PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING.FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE NOT AWARE, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE OUR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING FIRST, AND THEN WE'RE GONNA GO RIGHT INTO OUR COUNCIL MEETING RIGHT AFTER.
I HAVE A SPECIAL GUEST HERE TODAY.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO TELL 'EM YOUR NAME? SARAH, SPEAKING OF MIKE.
THIS IS COUNCIL MEMBER DWIGHT HU'S DAUGHTER.
SHE'S GONNA BE SITTING UP HERE WITH ME HELPING RUN THIS MEETING FOR TODAY.
ASHLEY, DO WE HAVE A QUORUM? WE HAVE A QUORUM.
WE GONNA DO THAT BEFORE THAT? YOU WANNA DO IT NOW? OKAY, GO AHEAD.
SO, UH, WE'RE GONNA DO THE INVOCATION AND PLEDGE BEFORE THE ZONING MEETING CUZ WE'RE GONNA GO RIGHT INTO OUR COUNCIL MEETING AFTERWARDS.
SO I HAVE A PLEASURE OF BRINGING TO YOU TODAY FOR OUR INVOCATION.
UH, MS. AMBER DI VERGILIO, MS. DI VERGILIO WAS, UH, JUST RECENTLY ELECTED TO REPRESENT DISTRICT THREE ON ZACHARY CITY COUNCIL AND WAS ELECTED BY HER PEERS UNANIMOUSLY AS MAYOR PRO TIM.
SO PLEASE HELP ME AND WELCOME THE NEW MAYOR PROTE FOR THE CITY OF ZACHARY AMBER D VERGILIO.
THANK YOU COUNCILMAN AND THE ENTIRE METRO COUNCIL FOR THE HONOR OF DELIVERING THE INVOCATION TO YOU TONIGHT.
DEAR HEAVENLY FATHER, WE COME TO YOU THIS EVENING TO BLESS THIS BODY AND COMMUNITY.
WE ASK YOU TO FILL OUR HEARTS, MINDS, AND SOULS WITH YOUR GRACE, YOUR LOVE, AND YOUR MERCY.
WE HUMBLY ASK FOR YOUR PEACE AS WE GO FORTH IN SERVICE OF OUR COMMUNITIES IN THIS GREAT PARISH.
AND FOR THE PLEDGE THIS EVENING, WE'RE GONNA HAVE OUR CHIEF CHIEF MICHAEL KIMBALL, A PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FRAUD.
WE, YOU AND WELCOME TO PUBLIC SERVICE.
[1. 22-01093 PUD-14-06 Mickens Road, Concept Plan Revision 3]
RIDE.UH, ITEM NUMBER ONE, PUT 14 DASH ZERO SIX MICKENS ROAD CONCEPT PLAN REVISION NUMBER THREE, PROPOSED REVISION AND REALLOCATE PHASE FOUR COMMERCIAL AREA INTO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MICKEN ROAD, WEST OF JU ROAD COUNCIL DISTRICT FIVE.
THERE HAS BEEN A REQUEST TO DELETE THIS ITEM.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? ANYONE WI WISHING TO SPEAK ON IT? UH, MICKEY ROBERTSON IS HERE WISHING TO SPEAK.
ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK? WE GO TO COUNCIL.
THERE'S A MOTION TO DELETE BY THE COUNCIL MEMBER.
IS THERE A SECOND? SECONDED BY THE CHAIR.
ANY OBJECTIONS? ITEM ONE HAS BEEN
[2. 22-00947 PA-16-22 10473 Pecue Lane]
DELETED.WE GO TO ITEM TWO, WHICH IS GOING TO REQUIRE EIGHT VOTES.
P 16 DASH 22 1 0 4 73 PEKU LANE TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN FROM AGRICULTURAL, RURAL TO RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST SIDE OF PEKU LANE, NORTH OF HIGHLAND ROAD.
DISTRICT NINE COMMISSION ACTION.
IS THERE ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON ITEM TWO? WE NOW GO TO COUNCIL MEMBERS.
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER GODA.
IS THERE ANY OBJECTIONS? ITEM TWO HAS BEEN DELETED.
[Items 3 & 4]
THREE AND FOUR.WE'RE GONNA TAKE TOGETHER PA 24 DASH 22 58 25 NORTH FOSTER DRIVE TO AMEND THE CONFERENCE AND LAND USE PLAN FROM RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF NORTH FOSTER TRIBE NORTH OF GREENWELLS THREE.
MOTION TO DEFER 60 DAYS UNTIL THE FEBRUARY 13TH MEETING CARRIED 50 BY THE COMMISSION.
ITEM NUMBER FOUR, CASE 65 DASH 2025.
8 25 NORTH FOSTER DRIVE TO REZONE FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
[00:05:01]
ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF NORTH FOSTER DRIVE NORTH OF GREENWELL STREET ON PROPERTY NOW FORMALLY KNOWN AS LOT, OH, EXCUSE ME, COUNCIL DISTRICT FIVE HUT MOTION TO DEFER FOR 60 DAYS UNTIL THE FEBRUARY 13TH MEETING.IS ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK ON ITEMS THREE AND FOUR? COUNCIL MEMBER HEAR TO FEBRUARY 13TH, MEETING TO THE FEBRUARY 15TH MEETING? YEP.
IS THERE A SECOND? SECONDED BY THE CHAIRS.
ANY OPPOSITION ITEMS THREE AND FOUR HAVE BEEN DEFERRED TO THE FEBRUARY 15TH
[5. 22-01665 PA-25-22 2100-2200 Millerville Road]
MEETING.ITEM FIVE, PA 25 DASH 22 2100 THROUGH 22 0 MILLVILLE ROAD TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN FROM COMMERCIAL TO COMPACT NEIGHBORHOOD ON PROPERTY LOCATED EASTERN MILLERVILLE SOUTH OF HUNTERS BRIDGE DRIVE COUNCIL DISTRICT EIGHT.
IS ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK ON ITEM FIVE? MICKEY ROBERTSON? UH, THANK YOU.
UH, MICKEY ROBERTSON, 93 45 INTERLINE AVENUE.
UH, MR. ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, I'M REALLY JUST HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, UH, IF THERE'S ANYTHING THAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE PROJECT.
ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK? WE NOW GO TO THE COUNCIL MEMBERS.
UM, SO FIVE AND SIX BASICALLY GO TOGETHER.
IT'S THE SAME PROPERTY AND I NEED TO MAKE A FLOOR AMENDMENT.
DO I, SHOULD I DO IT ON THIS ONE OR SHOULD I DO IT ON THE NEXT ITEM? THE SECOND ITEM.
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER HEARST.
IS THERE ANY OBJECTIONS TO ITEM FIVE? ITEM FIVE HAS BEEN APPROVED.
[6. 22-01666 SPUD-2-22 The Gates at Millerville]
WE GO TO ITEM SIX, SPUD TWO DASH 22, THE GATES AT MILLERVILLE TO ZONE FROM HEAVY COMMERCIAL TO SMALL PLAN UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR A MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST EASTERN MILLERVILLE ROAD, SOUTH OF HUNTERS BEACH DRIVE.DISTRICT EIGHT, ASO COMMISSION ACTION.
MOTION TO DEFER TO JANUARY 17TH.
UH, MICKEY ROBERTSON AGAIN, WISHING TO SPEAK ON ITEM SIX.
SAME THING HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS? ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK? WE NOW GO TO COUNCIL MEMBERS.
I CAME ON LAST NIGHT AND UM, BEFORE THEN, UH, SOME OF THE NEIGHBORS AND MY SUBDIVISION MET WITH, UH, COUNCILWOMAN AMMAR.
I, I DON'T SEE ANYBODY ELSE HERE.
BUT WE, THE ONES THAT SIGNED THE PETITION, WE ARE NOT, WE ARE OPPOSED TO HEAVY TRAFFICKING COMING INTO OUR SUBDIVISION.
I'VE BEEN THERE ABOUT 14 OR 15 YEARS AND MY STREET WOULD BE THE ONE THAT THE TRAFFIC WOULD COME INTO NOW, BEFORE NOW I, I LEARNED, I LEARNED BEFORE NOW THAT THE, THE, IT WAS GONNA BE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, BUT NOW THEY'RE SAYING THEY'RE RESIDENTIAL, UH, IS RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AND THE ONES THAT SIGNED THE PETITION WITH MYSELF ARE ASKING, WE ARE OPPOSED AGAINST IT BECAUSE, UH, OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS ONLY FOUR STREETS.
AND ME, MYSELF, I'M SPEAKING FOR ME, I WOULD LIKE FOR IT TO STAY THAT WAY.
NOW, MR. BLAKE AND YOUR NAME, I'M SORRY I FORGOT YOUR MICKEY, THEY TOLD US THAT THERE WILL NOT BE A LOT OF TRAFFICKING COMING INTO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, BUT WHAT I'M, UH, FORCING, IT MAY NOT BE NOW, BUT LATER ON AND NOT ONLY TRAFFICKING, WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH, UH, OTHER REST, OTHER NEIGHBORS, UH, MAYBE CRIME, UH, YOU KNOW, A LOT OF TRAFFIC.
THAT'S WHAT I'M CONCERNED ABOUT AND THAT'S WHY I'M HERE TO LET Y'ALL KNOW THAT I AM OPPOSED AGAINST THAT BEING A RESIDENT.
73 MORE HOUSES INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE WE HAVE 70 NOW.
SO THAT'S GONNA BE LIKE 143 MORE HOUSES AND THAT'S WHY I'M HERE, TO LET THE COUNCIL KNOW THAT I AM AGAINST IT, YOU KNOW, FOR IT TO BE A RESIDENTIAL AREA.
AND I SPOKE WITH MS. AMAROSA ABOUT IT ABOUT A WEEK AGO.
SO IF YOU WERE TAKING CONSIDERATION, NOT JUST MY, UH, MY OPPOSITION AGAINST THE, UH, RESIDENTIAL AREA, BUT IT'S ABOUT 25 OR 30 MORE OF US THAT I DON'T SEE HERE.
IS ANYONE ELSE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK ON ITEM SIX? ANYONE ELSE? WE NOW GO TO COUNCIL MEMBERS.
UM, SO JUST TO, TO LET HER KNOW THAT THE ONLY TRAFFIC THAT WILL BE ABLE TO GO THROUGH HER NEIGHBORHOOD
[00:10:01]
IS EMERGENCY VEHICLES ONLY.AM I CORRECT MICKEY? UM, SO MOTION TO APPROVE WITH, WITH A FLOOR AMENDMENT THAT THE, THE THING THAT THEY WERE CONCERNED ABOUT WAS A PEDESTRIAN GATE.
SO MOTION TO APPROVE TO WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT WE ELIMINATE THE PEDESTRIAN GATE MOTION TO APPROVE.
CAN, CAN I, I HAVE, UM, SOMEBODY FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO MAKE SURE WE GET THIS RIGHT.
SO IT WOULD THE, WOULD THE LANGUAGE TO DELETE THE PEDESTRIAN GATE FROM THE, UM, APPLICATION BE YEAH, THAT'S THE COUNCIL'S WISH.
THAT WOULD BE INAPPROPRIATE MOTION TO MAKE.
I SHOULD MAKE SURE I HAD THE LANGUAGE RIGHT.
CAN WE CLARIFY TO HAVE THE PEDESTRIAN GATE REMOVED FROM HUNTER'S RIDGE? CAUSE THERE ARE TWO PLANNED AND WE JUST WANNA ELIMINATE THE ONE INTO THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD GOING TOWARDS TARGET.
THE MAIN ENTRANCE TO THE DEVELOPMENT BY THE FRONT? YES, MA'AM.
FROM HUNTER'S RIDGE, MR. ROBERTSON.
THERE'S A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COUNCIL MEMBER ALMAR.
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER MO IS ANY OBJECTION TO ITEM? OH, YOU WANT, GO AHEAD.
SO DESCRIBE FOR ME THIS, UH, PEDESTRIAN.
IT, IT'S A, IS IT A PUBLIC STREET AND IT'S, IT'S NARROWED DOWN TO PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY OR WHAT? DESCRIBE FOR THESE I WAS TRYING TO PULL IT UP ON THE PLANS.
SO THE HUNTER'S RIDGE IS ONE OF THE STREETS IN, UH, MISS CAR, MS. CARTER, I BELIEVE IT'S NEIGHBORHOOD.
THAT DEAD ENDS INTO OUR PROPERTY.
WE'RE EXTENDING THAT STREET AS A PRIVATE STREET WITH AN EMERGENCY ACCESS GATE.
BUT ONE OF THE THINGS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ASKED WAS THAT WE PUT A PEDESTRIAN GATE THERE SO THAT OUR RESIDENTS COULD WALK INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD IF THEY WANTED TO.
THAT WAS ONE OF THEIR CONCERNS WAS THEY DIDN'T WANT THAT PEDESTRIAN GATE THERE.
SO, BUT IT WAS A STUB OUT, RIGHT OUT FROM, FROM THEIR SUBDIVISION.
AND YOU'RE ATTACHING IT TO YOUR SUBDIVISION, CORRECT? RIGHT.
AND YOU'RE CONNECTING YOUR, THAT IS YOU'RE CONNECTING POINT FROM ONE NEIGHBORHOOD TO ANOTHER? NO, THAT'S JUST THE EMERGENCY EXIT TO THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD.
OUR MAIN EXIT IS GONNA BE OUT INTO THE MILLERVILLE UH, DEVELOPMENT.
OKAY, BUT YOU'RE USING A STUB OUT OF AN EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD.
STUB OUTS ARE TO BE USED FOR CONNECTIVITY TO OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS? CORRECT.
MY AM I CORRECT? SOMETIMES IT'S LIKE PLANNING OR ANYBODY THAT COULD COME UP AND, AND DESCRIBE THE REASON I'M BRINGING THIS UP IS WE'VE BEEN REJECTED SEVERAL TIMES IN, IN MY PREVIOUS COUNCIL POSITION ON PUTTING UP EITHER PEDESTRIAN OR GATES OR EMERGENCY ACCESS OR WHATEVER BECAUSE YOU CAN'T BLOCK PUBLIC STREET ACCESS AND STUB OUTS ARE DECLARED, FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND, STUB OUTS ARE MADE TO BE EXTENDED INTO OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS AND THEY'RE PART OF THE PUBLIC STREETS.
THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE HAS A CONNECTIVITY REQUIREMENT.
THAT'S PRETTY MUCH WHAT WE'RE DISCUSSING RIGHT NOW.
THE APPLICANT IS FULFILLING THAT REQUIREMENT BY BUILDING THE PHYSICAL CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING STUB OUT.
BECAUSE THE DEVELOPMENT HAS PRIVATE STREETS AND PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE, WHICH THEY'RE ALLOWED TO DO.
THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO, TO PUT A GATE UP.
UM, THAT GATE AND THAT ACCESS HAS BEEN SIGNED OFF ON BY THE CITY PARISH MEETING ALL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS.
AT ANY POINT IN THE FUTURE, IF THEY WANTED TO REMOVE THAT GATE, IT WOULD BE UP TO THE PROPERTY OWNER.
THEY THERE, THERE'S A PROCESS TO DO THAT, BUT UM, WHAT'S BEING PRESENTED IS WITHIN THE GUIDELINES OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE NOW.
THERE HAS BEEN A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COUNCILMAN MAL MOROSA.
IS THERE SECOND? SO MOVED BY COUNCIL NUMBER.
SECONDED BY COUNCIL NUMBER MO.
IS THERE ANY OBJECTIONS? ARE THERE ANY OBJECTIONS? ITEM HAS BEEN APPROVED.
[7. 22-01667 Case 70-22 9494 Greenwell Springs Road]
WE NOW GO TO ITEM NUMBER SEVEN, CASE 70 DASH 22 9 4 9 4 GREENWOOD SPRING ROAD TO REZONE FROM LIGHT COMMERCIAL TO COMMERCIAL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE RESTAURANT, C A B ONE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF GREEN WEST SPRING ROAD, WEST OF OAK FOREST AVENUE COUNCIL DISTRICT SIX.MOTION TO APPROVE 50 BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK ON ITEM SEVEN? WE NOW GO TO COUNCIL MEMBERS.
SO MOVED BY COUNCIL MEMBER DUNN, SECONDED BY THE CHAIRS THERE.
ANY OBJECTION? ITEM SEVEN HAS BEEN APPROVED.
[8. 22-01668 Case 77-22 9702 Greenwell Springs Road]
ITEM EIGHT CASE SEVEN DASH 22 9 7 2[00:15:01]
GREENWOOD SPRINGS ROAD TO ZONE FROM LIGHT COMMERCIAL TO HEAVY COMMERCIAL ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF GREENWOOD SPRINGS ROAD COUNCIL DISTRICT SIX DUNN JEAN COMMISSION ACTION.ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK ON ITEM EIGHT? WE NOW GO TO COUNCIL.
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER ADAMS. ANY OBJECTIONS? ITEM EIGHT HAS BEEN APPROVED.
[9. 22-01670 Case 79-22 2801 Nicholson Drive]
9 79 2 2 2 8001 NICHOLSON DRIVE TO ZONE FROM INFIELD SMALL PLAN UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO LIGHT COMMERCIAL.ONE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NICHOLSON.
DRIVE SOUTH OF WEST GARFIELD STREET COUNCIL DISTRICT 10 COLEMAN COMMISSION ACTION.
ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK ON ITEM NINE? COUNCIL MEMBER COLEMAN.
MOTION TO APPROVE BY COUNCIL MEMBER COLEMAN.
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER ADAMS. ITEM NINE HAS BEEN
[10. 22-01671 Case 80-22 6767 Plank Road]
APPROVED CASE 80 22 67.THERE ZONE FROM LIGHT, INDUSTRIAL TO LIGHT, COMMERCIAL AND PROPERTY.
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF PLANK ROAD, NORTH OF MONTESANTO AVENUE COUNCIL DISTRICT 10 COLEMAN COMMISSIONER.
ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THE ITEM? COUNCIL MEMBER COLEMAN.
SECONDED BY THE COUNCIL MEMBER ADAM.
[11. 22-01672 Case 81-22 4630 Bluebonnet Boulevard]
10 HAS BEEN APPROVED.ITEM 11 CASE 8 1 22 4 6 30 BLUEMONT BOULEVARD TO ZONE FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO BLUE BOND DESIGN DISTRICT ON PROPERTY LOCATED WEST SIDE OF BBO BOULEVARD, NORTH OF OLEFIN ROAD COUNCIL.
DISTRICT 11 ADAMS COMMISSION ACTION.
ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK ON ITEM 11? WE NOW GO TO COUNCIL MEMBER ADAMS. SO MOVED BY COUNCIL MEMBER ADAM SECONDED BY THE CHAIR.
[12. 22-01673 PUD-3-22 Northridge (formerly Templeton Ridge)]
BEEN APPROVED.THREE DASH 22 NORTHRIDGE FORMALLY TEMPLETON RIDGE.
PROPOSED SUBMITTAL OF AN EXPIRED PLAN UNIT DEVELOPMENT BUDD FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY.
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF OLD CITY HIGHWAY WEST OF GROOM ROAD ON PROPERTY COUNCIL.
DISTRICT ONE, NOLE COMMISSIONER.
ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK ON ITEM 12? WE NO REGARD TO COUNCIL MEMBER NOEL.
MOTION TO APPROVE BY COUNCIL MEMBER NO SECONDARY BY COUNCIL MEMBER DUNN.
ANY OBJECTION COUNCIL? I MEAN ITEM 12 HAS BEEN APPROVED.
UH, THAT IS THE END OF OUR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING.